Continuation of chronic antiplatelet therapy is not associated with increased need for transfusions: a cohort study in critically ill septic patients.

BACKGROUND: The decision to maintain or halt antiplatelet medication in septic patients admitted to intensive care units presents a clinical dilemma. This is due to the necessity to balance the benefits of preventing thromboembolic incidents and leveraging anti-inflammatory properties against the increased risk of bleeding. METHODS: This study involves a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study focusing on patients diagnosed with severe sepsis or septic shock. We evaluated the outcomes of 203 patients, examining mortality rates and the requirement for transfusion. The cohort was divided into two groups: those whose antiplatelet therapy was sustained (n = 114) and those in whom it was discontinued (n = 89). To account for potential biases such as indication for antiplatelet therapy, propensity score matching was employed. RESULTS: Therapy continuation did not significantly alter transfusion requirements (discontinued vs. continued in matched samples: red blood cell concentrates 51.7% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.09; platelet concentrates 21.7% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.82; fresh frozen plasma concentrates 38.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.7). 90-day survival was higher within the continued group (30.0% vs. 70.0%; p < 0.001) and the Log-rank test (7-day survivors; p = 0.001) as well as Cox regression (both matched samples) suggested an association between continuation of antiplatelet therapy < 7 days and survival (HR: 0.24, 95%-CI 0.10 to 0.63, p = 0.004). Sepsis severity expressed by the SOFA score did not differ significantly in matched and unmatched patients (both p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that continuing antiplatelet therapy in septic patients admitted to intensive care units could be associated with a significant survival benefit without substantially increasing the need for transfusion. These results highlight the importance of a nuanced approach to managing antiplatelet medication in the context of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Liberal transfusion strategy to prevent mortality and anaemia-associated, ischaemic events in elderly non-cardiac surgical patients - the study design of the LIBERAL-Trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaemia leads to impaired oxygen supply with a risk of vital organ ischaemia. In healthy and fit individuals, anaemia can be compensated by several mechanisms. Elderly patients, however, have less compensatory mechanisms because of multiple co-morbidities and age-related decline of functional reserves. The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether elderly surgical patients may benefit from a liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy compared to a restrictive transfusion strategy. METHODS: The LIBERAL Trial is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled clinical phase IV trial randomising 2470 elderly (≥ 70 years) patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk non-cardiac surgery. Registered patients will be randomised only if Haemoglobin (Hb) reaches ≤9 g/dl during surgery or within 3 days after surgery either to the LIBERAL group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 9 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 9-10.5 g/dl) or the RESTRICTIVE group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 7.5 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 7.5-9 g/dl). The intervention per patient will be followed until hospital discharge or up to 30 days after surgery, whichever occurs first. The primary efficacy outcome is defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute ischaemic stroke, acute kidney injury (stage III), acute mesenteric ischaemia and acute peripheral vascular ischaemia within 90 days after surgery. Infections requiring iv antibiotics with re-hospitalisation are assessed as important secondary endpoint. The primary endpoint will be analysed by logistic regression adjusting for age, cancer surgery (y/n), type of surgery (intermediate- or high-risk), and incorporating centres as random effect. DISCUSSION: The LIBERAL-Trial will evaluate whether a liberal transfusion strategy reduces the occurrence of major adverse events after non-cardiac surgery in the geriatric population compared to a restrictive strategy within 90 days after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03369210 ).

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction mediated by platelet-activating antibodies that target complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Patients are at markedly increased risk of thromboembolism. OBJECTIVE: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about diagnosis and management of HIT. METHODS: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 33 recommendations. The recommendations address screening of asymptomatic patients for HIT, diagnosis and initial management of patients with suspected HIT, treatment of acute HIT, and special situations in patients with acute HIT or a history of HIT, including cardiovascular surgery, percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, renal replacement therapy, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Strong recommendations include use of the 4Ts score rather than a gestalt approach for estimating the pretest probability of HIT and avoidance of HIT laboratory testing and empiric treatment of HIT in patients with a low-probability 4Ts score. Conditional recommendations include the choice among non-heparin anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin, danaparoid, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants) for treatment of acute HIT.

Emergency transfusion of patients with unknown blood type with blood group O Rhesus D positive red blood cell concentrates: a prospective, single-centre, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency patients with unknown blood type usually receive O Rhesus D negative (RhD-) red blood cell concentrates until their blood group is determined to prevent RhD+ related adverse transfusion reactions. As 85% of individuals are RhD+, this consumption of O RhD- red blood cell concentrates contributes to shortages of O RhD- red blood cell concentrates, sometimes forcing transfusion of known RhD- patients with RhD+ red blood cell concentrates. Here we report the outcome of this transfusion policy transfusing all emergency patients with unknown blood type with O RhD+ red blood cell concentrates. METHODS: In this prospective single-centre observational study done between Jan 1, 2001, and Dec 31, 2015, we assessed all consecutive RhD- patients at the University Medicine Greifswald who received RhD+ red blood cell concentrates (emergency patients with unknown blood type; and RhD- patients receiving RhD+ red blood cell concentrates during RhD- red blood cell concentrate shortages). No patients were excluded. The primary endpoint was anti-D allo-immunisation at 2 months follow-up or later. Patients were followed up and tested for immunisation against red blood cell antigens using the direct antiglobulin test and an antibody screen every 3-5 days for 4 weeks or until death, or hospital discharge. Surviving patients were screened for development of anti-D antibodies for up to 12 months (at the predefined timepoints 2, 3, 6, and 12 months) after RhD+ red blood cell transfusion. FINDINGS: 437 emergency patients, of whom 85 (20%) were RhD-, received 2836 RhD+ red blood cell concentrates. The overall risk of inducing anti-D antibodies (in all 437 recipients) was 17 (4%, 95% CI 2·44-6·14) of 437 (assuming all patients lost to follow-up developed anti-D allo-immunisation). During this period, 110 known RhD- patients received RhD+ red blood cell concentrates during RhD- red blood cell concentrate shortages. Of these, 29 (26%; 95% CI 19·0-35·3) developed anti-D allo-immunisation (assuming all patients lost to follow-up developed anti-D), which was significantly higher than in the emergency patients with unknown blood type (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Transfusing emergency patients with unknown blood type with O RhD+ red blood cell concentrates has a low risk of inducing anti-D antibodies (3-6%), but saves more than 10% of the total O RhD- red blood cell concentrate demand, thereby reducing shortage of O RhD- red blood cell concentrates, the need to transfuse known RhD-patients with RhD+ red blood cell concentrates, and thus the overall risk to induce anti-D allo-immunisation in the population. These findings should be considered for transfusion guidelines. FUNDING: University Medicine Greifswald.

How I evaluate and treat thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit patient.

Multiple causes (pseudothrombocytopenia, hemodilution, increased consumption, decreased production, increased sequestration, and immune-mediated destruction of platelets) alone or in combination make thrombocytopenia very common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Persisting thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients is associated with, but not causative of, increased mortality. Identification of the underlying cause is key for management decisions in individual patients. While platelet transfusion might be indicated in patients with impaired platelet production or increased platelet destruction, it could be deleterious in patients with increased intravascular platelet activation. Sepsis and trauma are the most common causes of thrombocytopenia in the ICU. In these patients, treatment of the underlying disease will also increase platelet counts. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requires alternative anticoagulation at a therapeutic dose and immune thrombocytopenia immunomodulatory treatment. Thrombocytopenia with symptomatic bleeding at or above World Health Organization grade 2 or planned invasive procedures are established indications for platelet transfusions, while the evidence for a benefit of prophylactic platelet transfusions is weak and controversial. If the platelet count does not increase after transfusion of 2 fresh ABO blood group-identical platelet concentrates (therapeutic units), ongoing platelet consumption and high-titer anti-HLA class I antibodies should be considered. The latter requires transfusion of HLA-compatible platelet concentrates.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiac surgery and critically ill patients.

Thrombocytopenia as well as anti-platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) antibodies are common in cardiac surgery patients and those treated in the intensive care unit. In contrast, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is uncommon in these populations (~1 % and ~0.5 %, respectively). A stepwise approach where testing for anti-PF4/H antibodies is performed only in patients with typical clinical symptoms of HIT improves diagnostic specificity of the laboratory assays without losing sensitivity, thereby helping to avoid overdiagnosis and resulting HIT overtreatment. Short-term re-exposure to heparin, especially given intraoperatively for cardiovascular surgery, is a reasonable therapeutic option in patients with a history of HIT who subsequently test negative for HIT antibodies. Organ failure(s), enhanced bleeding risks, and other characteristics require special considerations regarding non-heparin anticoagulation: Argatroban is the alternative anticoagulant with pharmacokinetics independent of renal function, but it has a prolonged half-life in case of impaired liver function. For bivalirudin, protocols during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery are established, and it is suitable for patients with liver insufficiency. A major issue of direct thrombin inhibitors are false high activated partial thromboplastin time values in patients with comorbidities affecting prothrombin, which can result in systematic underdosing of the drugs. This is not the case for danaparoid and fondaparinux, which can be monitored by anti-factor Xa assays, but have long half-lives and no suitable antidote. This review includes also information on management of on- and off-pump cardiac surgery, ventricular assist devices, percutaneous interventions, continuous renal replacement therapy, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with HIT.

Further insights into the anti-PF4/heparin IgM immune response.

Anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies are not only the cause of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia but might also play a role in the antibacterial host defence. Recently, marginal zone (MZ) B cells were identified to be crucial for anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibody production in mice. Combining human studies and a murine model of polymicrobial sepsis we further characterised the far less investigated anti-PF4/heparin IgM immune response. We detected anti-PF4/heparin IgM antibodies in the sera of paediatric patients < 6 months of age after cardiac surgery and in sera of splenectomised mice subjected to polymicrobial sepsis. In addition, PF4/heparin-specific IgM B cells were not only found in murine spleen, but also in peritoneum and bone marrow upon in vitro stimulation. Together, this indicates involvement of additional B cell populations, as MZ B cells are not fully developed in humans until the second year of life and are restricted to the spleen in mice. Moreover, PF4/heparin-specific B cells were detected in human cord blood upon in vitro stimulation and PF4-/- mice produced anti-PF4/heparin IgM antibodies after polymicrobial sepsis. In conclusion, the anti-PF4/heparin IgM response is a potential innate immune reaction driven by a B cell population distinct from MZ B cells.

Discrepant post filter ionized calcium concentrations by common blood gas analyzers in CRRT using regional citrate anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: Ionized calcium (iCa) concentration is often used in critical care and measured using blood gas analyzers at the point of care. Controlling and adjusting regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) involves measuring the iCa concentration in two samples: systemic with physiological iCa concentrations and post filter samples with very low iCa concentrations. However, modern blood gas analyzers are optimized for physiological iCa concentrations which might make them less suitable for measuring low iCa in blood with a high concentration of citrate. We present results of iCa measurements from six different blood gas analyzers and the impact on clinical decisions based on the recommendations of the dialysis' device manufacturer. METHOD: The iCa concentrations of systemic and post filter samples were measured using six distinct, frequently used blood gas analyzers. We obtained iCa results of 74 systemic and 84 post filter samples from patients undergoing RCA for CRRT at the University Medicine of Greifswald. RESULTS: The systemic samples showed concordant results on all analyzers with median iCa concentrations ranging from 1.07 to 1.16 mmol/L. The medians of iCa concentrations for post filter samples ranged from 0.21 to 0.50 mmol/L. Results of >70% of the post filter samples would lead to major differences in decisions regarding citrate flow depending on the instrument used. CONCLUSION: Measurements of iCa in post filter samples may give misleading information in monitoring the RCA. Recommendations of the dialysis manufacturer need to be revised. Meanwhile, little weight should be given to post filter iCa. Reference methods for low iCa in whole blood containing citrate should be established.

Prevalence and clinical implications of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in intensive care patients: a prospective observational study.

Data on the frequency of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) antibodies and their association with outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients are sparse. In this prospective, observational study we screened 320 consecutive surgical/medical ICU patients for anti-PF4/H antibodies by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) for immunoglobulin (Ig)G/A/M separately and heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) at ICU admission (=baseline), day 6, and day 10. HIPA-positive patients were additionally tested by serotonin-release assay (SRA). Patients tested positive by day 10: for anti-PF4/H-IgG = 17.2 % and for anti-PF4/H-IgM = 42.1 %. Within the first 10 ICU days, platelet counts decreased to <100 Gpt/L in 27.8 % patients. However, only seven patients (2.2 %) experienced a drop in the platelet count ≥50 % beginning after the fourth ICU day. These included the only two patients (0.6 %; 95 % confidence interval 0.08-2.2 %) with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Only strong reactions in the HIPA were reproducible by SRA. This study confirms that testing for anti-PF4/H IgG antibodies should be restricted to ICU-patients who develop a platelet count decrease of >50 % that begins after day four of heparin treatment (which may have started before ICU admission). Among patients testing positive by IgG-specific EIA a functional platelet activation assay should be performed (regarding only strong reactions as positive).

Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit-diagnostic approach and management.

Thrombocytopenia often complicates critical illness and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Approaching thrombocytopenia is challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of the multifactorial pathogenesis of this disorder. Interpretation of the platelet count course after ICU admission is helpful to narrow down the cause of thrombocytopenia. Whereas a moderate decrease within the first 3 days is rather typical in severely ill patients, an absent or blunted platelet count increase after 5 days indicates continuing critical illness and a worse outcome. A rapid decrease in platelet counts of more than 50% within 1-2 days, especially if occurring after an intermittent rise, requires immediate attention as it may be a symptom of immune-mediated mechanisms, eg, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Treatment should target the underlying disease. Platelet transfusions are indicated in bleeding patients, while there is no strong evidence supporting the usefulness of prophylactic transfusions in ICU patients.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin or other polyanions. Most laboratory assays for HIT have a high sensitivity for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and a negative test generally excludes HIT (high negative predictive value), especially in a setting of a low pretest probability. The magnitude of a positive test result correlates with greater likelihood of HIT. Therefore, a combined diagnostic approach that considers the clinical picture and the magnitude of a positive test result is recommended for accurate diagnosis of HIT.

Anti-protamine-heparin antibodies: incidence, clinical relevance, and pathogenesis.

Protamine, which is routinely used after cardiac surgery to reverse the anticoagulant effects of heparin, is known to be immunogenic. Observing patients with an otherwise unexplained rapid decrease in platelet count directly after protamine administration, we determined the incidence and clinical relevance of protamine-reactive antibodies in patients undergoing cardiac-surgery. In vitro, these antibodies activated washed platelets in a FcγRIIa-dependent fashion. Using a nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mouse model, those antibodies induced thrombocytopenia only when protamine and heparin were present but not with protamine alone. Of 591 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, 57 (9.6%) tested positive for anti-protamine-heparin antibodies at baseline and 154 (26.6%) tested positive at day 10. Diabetes was identified as a risk factor for the development of anti-protamine-heparin antibodies. In the majority of the patients, these antibodies were transient and titers decreased substantially after 4 months (P < .001). Seven patients had platelet-activating, anti-protamine-heparin antibodies at baseline and showed a greater and more prolonged decline in platelet counts compared with antibody-negative patients (P = .003). In addition, 2 of those patients experienced early arterial thromboembolic complications vs 9 of 584 control patients (multivariate analysis: odds ratio, 21.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.90-160.89; P = .003). Platelet-activating anti-protamine-heparin antibodies show several similarities with anti-platelet factor 4-heparin antibodies and are a potential risk factor for early postoperative thrombosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: further evidence for a unique immune response.

Cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB) is associated with a high incidence of IgG Abs against platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) complexes by day 6 after surgery. These Abs are associated with an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Although the early onset of the anti-PF4/H IgG response is compatible with a secondary immune response, the rapid decline of Ab titers thereafter is not. To shed light on the origin of these Abs, in the present study, we prospectively compared the kinetics of these Abs with that of Abs against 2 recall Ags and to that of autoantibodies in 166 CPB patients over 4 months. Surgery induced strong inflammation, as shown by an increase in mean C-reactive protein levels. Consistent with previous studies, anti-PF4/H IgG optical density transiently increased between baseline and day 10 (P < .001; not associated with C-reactive protein levels), followed by a decrease over the next months. In contrast, concentrations of antidiphtheria toxin IgG and antitetanus toxin IgG increased constantly over the 4 months after surgery by 25%-30%. IgG autoantibodies did not change. Therefore, the transient kinetics of the anti-PF4/H IgG response resembled neither that of recall Abs nor that of IgG autoantibodies, but rather showed a unique profile.

The diagnostic value of the anti-PF4/heparin immunoassay high-dose heparin confirmatory test in cardiac surgery patients.

There are limited and conflicting data on how a confirmatory step using high-dose heparin can improve diagnostic specificity of the antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme immunoassay for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We investigated sera from a recently published study on cardiac surgery patients and found that only half of the sera that were heparin-induced platelet activation assay positive could be inhibited (optical density <40%) by high-dose heparin (100 IU/mL) in the enzyme immunoassay. More importantly, only 2 of the 3 patients with definite HIT were confirmatory test positive. Therefore, the high-dose heparin confirmatory test should be used with caution to exclude platelet-activating antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies or clinical HIT.

Incidence and clinical relevance of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies before cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by anti-platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies, which activate platelets. In some patients, anti-PF4/H antibodies are already detectable before cardiac surgery. Whether preoperative presence of antibodies confers adverse prognosis and which particular antibody classes (IgG, IgA, IgM) might be implicated are unknown. METHODS: We prospectively screened 591 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for heparin-dependent antibodies by PF4/H immunoassay (separately for IgG, IgA, and IgM) and platelet activation test at preoperative baseline and at days 6 and 10. All patients received heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin postsurgery regardless of antibody status and were followed for postoperative complications, frequency of HIT, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Anti-PF4/H antibodies of any class were detected at preoperative baseline in 128 (21.7%) of 591 patients: IgG n = 44 (7.4%), IgA n = 36 (6.1%), and IgM n = 79 (13.4%); some patients had >1 antibody class. Neither IgG nor IgA was a risk factor for any adverse outcome parameter. However, preoperative presence of IgM antibodies was associated with an increased risk for nonthromboembolic complications (all complications combined: hazard ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.15-2.61) and a longer in-hospital stay (P = .02), but without evidence for increased risk of thrombotic complications or subsequent HIT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with preoperative anti-PF4/H antibodies of IgG and IgA class are not at increased risk for thrombotic or nonthrombotic adverse events, whereas those with baseline anti-PF4/H IgM had an increased risk of nonthrombotic adverse outcomes but not of subsequent HIT or thrombosis. Because IgM antibodies do not cause HIT, they could represent a surrogate marker for other heparin-independent risk factors.

Perioperative thrombocytopenia in cardiac surgical patients - incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, morbidities and mortality.

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication of heparin therapy. At our institution, postoperative cardiac surgical patients are screened for HIT antibodies, when platelet counts persist to be less than 50% of the baseline level or less than 50000 nl(-1). In the present study, we compared the outcomes in HIT-antibody-positive and HIT-antibody-negative patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a cardiac surgical procedure between 1999 and 2007 and in whom a clinical suspicion of HIT prompted a test for heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies, that is, the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test, were retrieved from the database. Patients were divided in group 1 (antibodies present) and group 2 (no antibodies present). RESULTS: In 153 of more than 10000 patients (1.5%), a HIPA test was performed, Of those, 21 patients tested positive (group 1) and 132 tested negative (group 2). Central venous and pulmonary thrombo-embolism was more frequent in group 1 (10% vs 2%, p=0.04). Intestinal, microvascular thrombo-embolism was more frequent in group 2 (15% as opposed to 0%, p=0.03). By multivariate analysis, only patient age (p=0.04, confidence interval (CI): 1.04 (1.00-1.08)), female sex (p=0.03 CI 3.45 (1.51-7.86)) and perioperative sepsis (p<0.001 CI 6.88 (2.96-16.02)) were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients in whom a low platelet count prompted testing for HIT antibodies, had a high mortality (59%), independent of whether heparin-dependent antibodies were present, indicating that a persistently lowered platelet count is a bad prognostic sign after cardiac surgery. Interestingly, the HIPA-positive patients had more central venous and pulmonary embolisms. Patient age, female sex and perioperative sepsis were risk factors for perioperative mortality.

Studies of the anti-platelet factor 4/heparin immune response: adapting the enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay for detection of memory B cells against complex antigens.

BACKGROUND: The anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin immune response, which underlies heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), has several atypical features: relatively rapid onset even without previous heparin exposure, lack of immune anamnesis, and transience of antibody production. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We modified the enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay to investigate for PF4/heparin-specific memory B cells in cardiac surgery patients, in whom the high anti-PF4/heparin immunization rate made a prospective study feasible. The PF4-containing antigen complexes were attached to microtiter plates via a spacer, rather than using nitrocellulose, and the final reaction enzyme substrate was added in melted agarose which, after rapid hardening, localized color development of enzyme-tagged anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG) probes to single PF4/heparin-specific B cells. This modified ELISPOT assay was applied to 58 consecutive patients (testing blood from preoperative baseline and Postoperative Days 6 and 10), in which we compared detectability of PF4/heparin-specific B cells to tetanus toxin-specific B cells (comparator group with presumed vaccination). RESULTS: No patient had detectable PF4/heparin-specific memory B cells at baseline. In 2 of 30 patients (6.7%) who formed anti-PF4/heparin IgG, PF4/heparin-specific memory B cells (three to four spots/well) were detected by Postoperative Day 10, whereas tetanus toxin-specific memory B cells were found in 12 of 24 (50.0%) patients tested (3-25 spots/well; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HIT lacks a strong memory B-cell response, perhaps explaining transience and lack of anamnesis of the anti-PF4/heparin immune response. The technical modifications we describe for the ELISPOT assay, which permit detection of B-cell reactions to complex antigens, could be useful for studying other immunohematologic disorders, for example, drug-dependent thrombocytopenia and acquired hemophilia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in intensive care patients.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious, prothrombotic, immune-mediated complication of heparin therapy that can cause limb- and life-threatening thromboembolic events. Prompt diagnosis and therapeutic dose anticoagulation by an alternative anticoagulant are crucial to improve clinical outcome. In critically ill patients, the diagnosis of HIT is difficult due to the high incidence of thrombocytopenia, often caused by reasons other than HIT, and the high incidence of clinically irrelevant, non-platelet-activating anti-PF4-heparin antibodies. Also, treatment of HIT is problematic in these patients. No antidote is available for any of the alternative anticoagulants, and their half-lives are often prolonged in the presence of renal or hepatic insufficiency. This increases the risk of bleeding complications and mandates careful balancing of both risks, thrombosis and bleeding. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of HIT and individual choice of alternative anticoagulant are important for the adequate management of critically ill HIT patients.

Management of anticoagulation in patients with subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia scheduled for heart transplantation.

Anticoagulation management of patients with recent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery is a serious challenge, and especially difficult in patients requiring urgent heart transplantation. As nonheparin anticoagulants during CPB bear a high risk of major bleeding, these patients are at risk of being taken off the transplant list. Short-term use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) for CPB, with restriction of UFH to the surgery itself, is safe and effective in patients with a history of HIT who test negative for antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. We present evidence that it is safe to expand the concept of UFH reexposure to patients with subacute HIT (ie, those patients with recent HIT in whom the platelet count has recovered but in whom anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies remain detectable) requiring heart transplantation, if they test negative by a sensitive functional assay using washed platelets. This can be lifesaving in patients with end-stage heart failure.